<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Cameras Leave Unique &#8216;Pixel&#8217; Fingerprints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcin.net/update/2006/04/29/digital-cameras-leave-unique-pixel-fingerprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcin.net/update/2006/04/29/digital-cameras-leave-unique-pixel-fingerprints/</link>
	<description>New, tips, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zarquon</title>
		<link>http://pcin.net/update/2006/04/29/digital-cameras-leave-unique-pixel-fingerprints/#comment-76466</link>
		<dc:creator>Zarquon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 22:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcin.net/update/index.php/2006/04/29/digital-cameras-leave-unique-pixel-fingerprints/#comment-76466</guid>
		<description>This is great news! Aside from the loss of anonymous "Peeping Tom" types (and other questionable uses for digies), this provides a great tool for copyright infringement cases to we honest photographers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news! Aside from the loss of anonymous &#8220;Peeping Tom&#8221; types (and other questionable uses for digies), this provides a great tool for copyright infringement cases to we honest photographers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
