Monthly Archive for September, 2005

Framing for Printing - Digital Photography Tip of the Week

Last week I finished up my two part series on digital camera features. This week we discuss sensor proportion (aspect ratio) and framing your shot for printing.

Digital camera sensors come in basically two rectangular shapes. Digital SLR’s use a sensor that has an aspect of 2:3. Most other digital cameras use a ratio of 3:4, similiar to most computer screens. What does this mean to you?

When shooting with a regular digital camera (not an SLR) your image will fit on a computer screen and show all of the image. But what about your print the image? Because of the format of the sensor, there will be some cropping that will happen when you print to a standard size photographic print. The amount of cropping is determined by the size of the print. The following table show how much cropping is done on an image for both types of sensors when the image is oriented in landscape position, that is with the long side on the bottom. This is assuming the image is cropped to print as much of the image as possible. Values in the table represent how much is lost when cropped.

 
4×6
5×7
8×10
11×14
16×20
Digital SLR
(2:3)
No Cropping
1/4"
left and right
1"
left and right
1.25"
left and right
2"
left and right
Non-SLR
(3:4)
1/4"
top and bottom
1/8"
top and bottom
1/3"
left and right
1/3"
left and right
2/3"
left and right

This is further illustrated by the following illustration showing the amount of the photo cropped when printed on a 4×6, 5×7 or 8×10.

Cropping effects of printing standard size photos

With that in mind, when you take your picture, you will want to leave some room around your subject to account for any cropping you may have to do when you print the image. This is where a camera with higher resolution helps because you can then crop around your subject while still retaining enough data for a quality print.

The cropping for print sizes occurs with film camera’s as well. 35mm film uses the same 2:3 ratio so when shooting with film, follow the guidelines for the digital SLR sensor.

Next week I will talk about how to crop your images to maintain quality.

I have been receiving feedback from our readers on our digital photography tip of the week, keep them coming! Reader Leeor Geva sent me a note letting me know about smugmug.com which is an an online photo sharing and backup service. He also sent along a promotional code (26HHBTzZXP7E6) that will save you $5 off the yearly fee if you sign up. Simply enter the code in the referred by field. Another reader, Jim Kniskern sent along his excellent comments about digital printing. I have posted those on the blog for everyone to read and comment on.

 

The digital photography tip of the week is written by the PCIN Assistant Editor, Chris Empey. Chris is a long time photographer and is currently the vice-president of the Niagara Falls Camera Club. You can see more of his photography at his Photo of the Day website.
If you have a tip to send Chris, or a question about digital photography he can address in the newsletter, send it to chris@pcin.net.

Infoplease.com

Their slogan pretty much says it all:
All the knowledge you need

The Infoplease site has an excyclopedia, almanac, atlas, biographis, dictionary, thesaurus, and many other reference materials. The site looks pretty neat. Check it out at http://www.infoplease.com/

WorldStart Computer Tips, Tricks, and Help

WorldStart sells various software titles, but they also have an excellent tips section of their site. There are currently 1277 “Regular Tips” and 543 “Coolsites” listed. The main tips page randomly chooses a tip to show. The tips are also divided into categories. There is a listing of the most recent tips, along with the most popular tips.

Reader comments about Digital Photo Printing

PCIN reader Jim Kniskern sent the following email to us with some very good information about photo printing in response to our tip feature in our PCIN Update issue 360. Feel free to leave any comments on what he has to say.

Chris: On reading today’s item on having commercial prints made in preference to using a home printer, I have a comment. I worked in the paper industry for 50 years, including in a printing subsidiary. I helped develop widely used coated bleached paperboard for packaging (foods, pharmaceuticals, etc.)

Our customers included not just Canadians and Americans, but I traveled also in Europe where we had excellent sales. I was impressed that the English consider as garrish the glossy paper coatings favored in America; they prefer soft, velvety, matte coatings as a much more luxurious printing background. Yes, glossy photo paper provides lots of snap to a print, but I question whether it offers any more detail than matte coatings for photo reproduction. The real criteria for the printing surface should be:
1) Quality of ink holdout, so that the printed dots do not spread nor soak into the sheet.
2) Dot reproduction, where no dots are missing, nor missing in detail due to roughness, surface defects, or an unreceptive coating.
3) Brightness of the coating on which the dots lie. This influences true reproduction of colors. Color printing starts with all the colors of the sprectrum in the base coating, then proceeds to apply colored filters in the form of magenta, cyan and yellow inks. The higher the brightness underneath, the greater the range of hues than can possibly be produced.

Gloss levels of photo paper would appear to be unrelated to these properties. I routinely use a good matte finish paper for printing digital photos at a cost of roughly 10 cents per 8 1/2 X 11 sheet. When mounted in a frame behind glass, they appear identical to those printed on expensive glossy paper.

I am humble enough to say: “I would like to hear comments on this by others more expert than I.”

By the way, I still do not take exception to your overall conclusion. The commercial outlets that offer digital prints pay much less for their inks in bulk than do we consumers.

…Jim Kniskern

The pungent stench of e-waste

From IT World Canada:

Something’s cooking in a forgotten corner of the province of Zheijiang, China — and it’s the perfect recipe for a health and environmental disaster. Ingredients of this toxic swill include assorted electronic circuit boards simmered in pure nitric and hydrochloric acids.

For a meagre $1.50 a day, labourers in the province’s Taizhou region heat computer circuit boards in order to extract and recover valuable metals within the products for reuse. The process is done outdoors, by hand, and releases lethal toxic fumes.

Can Bloggers Strike It Rich?

From Wired News:

When it comes to the profit potential of blogs, Nick Denton, founder of Gawker Media, calls himself a skeptic.
It’s a surprisingly pessimistic perspective coming from the Brit who has launched a network of 13 theme blogs — including Fleshbot (porn), Gawker and Defamer (gossip), Gizmodo (gadgets) and Wonkette (politics). His most popular properties (Defamer, Gizmodo and Gawker) report between 4 million and 6 million visits per month and millions more pageviews, he and his top talent have been featured in articles in the ink-and-pulp press (Wired, The New York Times Magazine) and Denton rarely misses an opportunity to trumpet ads on his sites for blue-chip companies like Absolut, Audi, Sony, Nike, Viacom, Disney and Condé Nast.
So you can forgive his competitors for not buying into his deflationary spin

Report: Broadband Growth Burning Out

From the E-Commerce News:

Fewer of the remaining Americans not hooked up to the Internet are getting online, and fewer existing dial-up users are spending enough time on the Web to want to move up to broadband access, reports the Pew Internet Project in its latest study on U.S. broadband growth.

Pew’s May 2005 survey indicated that 53 percent of Americans get online with high-speed connections, up 3 percent since December 2004, but described by Pew as a “statistically insignificant increase” that is likely to remain flat or even drop further in the near future.

Analysts attribute the slowdown to a saturation of users, and a reluctance of today’s dial-up Internet users to pay more for bandwidth that they don’t necessarily need.

Online answers, if all else fails

From the New York Times (via International Herald Tribune):

When David Sarokin finishes his day job as an environmental scientist in Washington, he heads home to a second batch of questions.

He is one of several hundred humans who work for Google, answering questions from users who are not satisfied with their results from the automated engine that made Google famous.

The queries that users bring to Google Answers (answers.google.com) touch on all parts of life but usually cannot be reduced to a few key words.

Google to Yahoo: Ours is bigger

From CNet News:

In the latest round of the search-index size contest, Google unveiled an updated index it said is more than three times larger than that of any of its search engine competitors.

“We’re celebrating our seventh birthday…We had a pretty strong year,” Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said in a phone interview with CNET News.com, as he listed the launch of new products including Google Talk, Google Earth, Google Video and Google Desktop Search. “And we’ve sort of been struggling here with respect to the index. It has always been much larger than the others.”

“We’re announcing tonight that in terms of unduplicated pages our index is now three times larger than any other search engine,” he said, without saying how many pages are in the index.

Password Agent 2.3.4

One of the most useful utilities I have reviewed is Password Agent by Moon Software. It can save your passwords, auto-fill login forms, and generate passwords for you if you wish. They just recently released a minor update to the software:

This update addresses bugs that were discovered after introduction of the previous release. As always, this is free update to all 2.x users. Just download the new version and install it on top of your existing Password Agent installation to perform easy and automatic upgrade.